Skinny VS Curvy |
- Mila Kunis: ’95 pounds looked gross, but on camera, it looked amazing’
- These Thin Legs Belong to…
- Heidi Klum: ‘I’m not running to get Botox’
Mila Kunis: ’95 pounds looked gross, but on camera, it looked amazing’ Posted: 20 Nov 2010 09:34 AM PST On losing 20 pounds for her role as a ballerina:
On how being ultra-skinny looks in reality versus on camera:
Pictured: left, Mila in February 2010, while she was still filming and on the right, Mila these days. Can you see the 20 pound difference (keep in mind she gains more on her middle / upper half)? Further info: Mila is 5’4” (her words) – she must have been around 95 pounds (BMI 16.3) on the left and around 115 lbs (BMI 19.7) on the right. See more pictures of Mila at her skinniest in THIS post! © Versus for Skinny VS Curvy, 2010. | Permalink | No comment Related posts |
Posted: 20 Nov 2010 09:00 AM PST Can you guess the legs that are hiding under thick brown stockings? These Thin Legs Belong to… Turn the page to see! ... © Versus for Skinny VS Curvy, 2010. | Permalink | 4 comments Related posts |
Heidi Klum: ‘I’m not running to get Botox’ Posted: 20 Nov 2010 08:47 AM PST A few days ago, supermodel Heidi Klum was telling us that ‘skinny isn’t always better’ – and today, the same Heidi talks about aging:
… says Heidi in Self Magazine. © Versus for Skinny VS Curvy, 2010. | Permalink | One comment Related posts |
You are subscribed to email updates from Skinny VS Curvy To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.